Research on the governance dilemma and sustainable mechanism innovation of urban household waste classification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65514/5sj6hv02Keywords:
Garbage classification; Governance dilemma; Sustainable mechanisms; Pluralistic governance; Policy innovationAbstract
With the rapid advancement of urbanization in China, the amount of urban household waste generated continues to increase, and the phenomenon of "garbage encirclement" is becoming increasingly serious.This article systematically explores the main challenges faced by current garbage classification work in government management, market operation, and social participation through field research and case analysis.Research has found that there are problems at the government level such as movement style governance and poor departmental coordination;At the market level, there are challenges such as an imperfect recycling system and a broken industrial chain;On the social level, it manifests as difficulties such as low resident participation and weak classification awareness.In response to these issues, this article will propose a series of innovative paths, including improving the legal and regulatory system, promoting intelligent classification equipment, and building a diversified governance pattern, aiming to provide theoretical references and practical guidance for promoting the transformation of China's urban garbage classification work from short-term governance to long-term governance.
References
1.Abraham, Z., Shenghao, X., Yu, G., Changjun, L., & Yanping, L. (2023). Barriers to compulsory waste sorting for a circular economy in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 342, 118180-118180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Jenvman.2023.118180
2. Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
3. Cao, G., Liu, P., & Cao, R. (2024). Resident motivations, policy types and multisphere waste sorting intentions in China from a dual-interest integration perspective: An expanded goal-framing theory. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 108, 107596-107596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Eiar.2024.107596
4. Dehua, Z., Jiawen, L., & Sha, L. (2024). Reducing environmental pollution: what affects the waste sorting of Chinese urban residents? The theory of planned behavior with community convenience. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 26(4), 2084-2098. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-024-01943-5
5. Han, G., Zhai, P., Zhu, L., & Li, K. (2023). Economic Incentives, Reputation Incentives, and Rural Residents’ Participation in Household Waste Classification: Evidence from Jiangsu, China. Agriculture, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13101931
6. Hu, L. (2021). Study on Treatment Dilemma and Countermeasures of Community Garbage Classification in Chengdu. 2021 7th International Conference on Business, Economics and Management Innovation,
7. Kannan, G., Yue, Z., & Gang, C. (2022). Analysis of factors influencing residents waste sorting behavior: A case study of Shanghai. Journal of Cleaner Production, 349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Jclepro.2022.131126
8. Liu, H., Shang, H., & Yu, J. (2025). Why waste sorting implementation remains ineffective: A theoretical analysis based on the generation process of waste sorting behavior in China. Waste Management, 201, 114812-114812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Wasman.2025.114812
9. Lu, W., Wei, W., Jingyi, M., & Liyun, L. (2024). Research on Strategies for Promoting Waste Classification in Universities. Academic Journal of Environment & Earth Science, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.25236/ajee.2024.060608
10. Nhung, N. T. K. (2023). The determinants of individuals’ waste separation intention in an urbanizing city: A case study of Hanoi, Vietnam. Habitat International, 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Habitatint.2023.102835
11. Qian, L., Liu, Q., & Gong, H. (2025). Stick or carrot, which works better on residents’ waste separation behavior. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 27(6), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-025-02381-7
12. Shen, Y., Zhu, T., Kumar, R., Kumar, A., & Chen, S. (2023). Domestic Garbage Classification and Incentive-Based Policies in China: An Empirical Analysis. Water, 15(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/w15234074
13. Wang, J., Li, Y., Hou, Q., Liu, L., Li, S., Chen, Y., Wang, T., & Zhang, Y. (2026). Emissions and distribution characteristics of heavy metal in a waste incineration plant. Fuel, 407(PA), 137280-137280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Fuel.2025.137280
14. Wenming, C., Mengyun, X., Yayun, L., & Xuesong, Y. (2024). The Smart City Waste Classification Management System: Strategies and Applications Based on Computer Vision. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 36(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.351242
15. Yunming, K., & Boqiang, L. (2021). Public participation and city sustainability: Evidence from Urban Garbage Classification in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Scs.2021.102741
16.Zhang, J., Wen, Z., Hu, Y., Fei, F., Wang, Y., & Xie, Y. (2024). System simulation and multi-objective optimization methodology for sustainable municipal solid waste classification management: A case study in China. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 50, 475-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Spc.2024.08.014
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Contemporary Sustainability Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
